tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878943886852694399.post5378239280522920856..comments2023-08-09T20:08:45.519-05:00Comments on An Oklahoma Granny: Ghosts of Christmas PastOklahoma Grannyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10053304659210754009noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878943886852694399.post-38509629724537446442009-12-02T15:08:46.604-06:002009-12-02T15:08:46.604-06:00I have no idea.
But glad you had atleast one turn ...I have no idea.<br />But glad you had atleast one turn out good.Twisted Fenceposthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15973165692768831966noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878943886852694399.post-6462322508120614452009-12-01T22:51:22.330-06:002009-12-01T22:51:22.330-06:00I have no ideas but I do love the pictures. Kind o...I have no ideas but I do love the pictures. Kind of fun in a weird, spooky way. lolMarlahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18000815937078399278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878943886852694399.post-30051433400146940612009-12-01T19:54:58.274-06:002009-12-01T19:54:58.274-06:00That is so strange and kind of creepy! HAHA! Love ...That is so strange and kind of creepy! HAHA! Love the old pictures. It's so much fun to check out the hair and the glasses! We have some that look just like this one but without the ghosty stuff.Kathyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09582104259056007093noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878943886852694399.post-78364295254078700452009-12-01T17:48:06.777-06:002009-12-01T17:48:06.777-06:00Water on the lens? Sunlight reflection? Maybe it w...Water on the lens? Sunlight reflection? Maybe it was missing its flux capacitor! How nice that you have these photos 20 years later.Lanyardladyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14461038657517013524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878943886852694399.post-81842473284707054192009-12-01T17:40:48.033-06:002009-12-01T17:40:48.033-06:00If it wasn't a double-exposure, could it have ...If it wasn't a double-exposure, could it have been a long shutter? It could have taken the background shot while you were moving into place on a timed exposure. With a long time exposure, you can get a picture of yourself standing alone on Broadway! It wouldn't have been in the developing since that wouldn't make the lights show through the bodies. The lights had to be exposed to the film.Lillian Robinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13488638666900705015noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878943886852694399.post-86512406219037367562009-12-01T09:43:35.323-06:002009-12-01T09:43:35.323-06:00Ha! Hurry, find Doc Brown and get in the DeLorean!...Ha! Hurry, find Doc Brown and get in the DeLorean!<br /><br />It does look just like "Back to the Future"Angelahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03892832349519784888noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878943886852694399.post-8117034326279244312009-12-01T09:19:59.144-06:002009-12-01T09:19:59.144-06:00My husband suggested that the developer might be b...My husband suggested that the developer might be bad as well. He's had a similar experience in the past and said "Take them to another developer if they still have the negatives and see how they turn out."<br /><br />He said that if they are reprinted and they come out clearer then it was the developer. Otherwise it most likely was bad film. <br /><br />*grins* I hope that helps solve the mystery.Cathrynhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06804443617345021699noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878943886852694399.post-82418921391155618082009-12-01T09:12:35.088-06:002009-12-01T09:12:35.088-06:00I'm no expert mind you...but I would suggest t...I'm no expert mind you...but I would suggest that the film was old. Or the emulsion on the film was thinner on one part of the film strip. *shrugs* But that's at best--a guess!<br /><br />Love the family photos! Even the ghostly ones.Cathrynhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06804443617345021699noreply@blogger.com